This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Wow, Robin, this is something! =20
How long ago did you do this? If there was a need to remove the =
bushings, would the CA make them any more difficult to remove? (I just =
have to ask.)
Thanks so much for sharing your experiment! Yes, I think I'll give it a =
try--as you said, I have nothing to lose. =20
Barbara Richmond
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Robin Hufford=20
To: Pianotech=20
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: Rebushing centers
Hello Barbara,
I think it is vital to properly shrink and stabilize the =
bushings after installation. Otherwise, you will be where you are now =
with the inadequate Steinway parts (something ridiculous and telling in =
itself for a company in business doing this for 150 years,) you refer =
to in recent posts, that is, the friction will not be stable and the =
hammer will also wobble causing a loss of power. =20
I have used shrinking fluid combinations with proportions ranging =
from 50/50 to 75/25 or so, water and methyl alcohol and had good =
results. Although, I have had, on occasion, a need to do some over, as =
some were still, after drying, loose. These were then rendered =
acceptable after another treatment. =20
An interesting new possibility, which had occurred to me one day =
as I was waiting for a conventionally treated set to dry and is, as far =
as I can tell, a completely new technique since I have not seen it =
referred to anywhere or heard any discussion about it elsewhere, I =
decided to try on a set of Tokiwa shanks which had a very soft, =
unstable bushing that responded to pining exactly as you describe with =
the Steinway, is, perhaps, better. =20
This method uses water thin CA glue thinned even further to =
about about a 90/10 acetone/glue mix. It occurs to me now, as I write =
this, that it may work better if a little methyl alcohol is added as a =
wetting agent, if possible, although I haven't done this. There may be =
complications if alcohol is used which I am unaware of at the moment.=20
As you know, of course, the CA rapidly sets and this =
characteristic obviates the need for the prolonged drying necessary when =
using water. One can vary the mixture as desired to control its =
effects, but if too much CA is used it will make the bushing so hard =
that it will click and this defeats the purpose of its use. Too little =
and there is not enough stability induced in the bushing. =20
On the piano I tried this on I have had very good results; the =
pining is stable and there was a noticeable increase in power. I tried =
at first to apply it simply by dripping the mixture onto the bushing: =
this does have an effect, but, eventually, I removed the pining, wetted =
the bushing and then reinstalled a pin. Perhaps, as I indicated =
above, a wetting agent like methyl alcohol will make it possible to do =
this without even removing the pining. All of the flanges on this =
piano had already been repinned, some twice or even three times. They =
had progressively loosened as you described earlier. =20
Judging from your recent posts you are considering rebushing =
the inadequate Steinway shanks you have referred to. I would try this =
technique before rebushing were this problem one I had to solve. I =
think, once resigned to rebushing, you have nothing to lose. =20
Regards, Robin Hufford=20
Barbara Richmond wrote:
Here's a question for you who rebuild action parts:
I've rebushed flanges before, you know, one here or there, but have =
never done a whole set.
Are there any secrets besides just plain old rebushing? For =
example, do you shrink the bushings after you've put them in?
Thanks,
Barbara Richmond, RPT
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b2/5d/ae/14/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC