> Most energy that gets into the rim is damped. Very > little is radiated to the > air as sound energy. All wood has internal > resistance. It is this resistance > that dampens the wave energy that is coupled to it > from the soundboard. It's > a loss, loss situation. Dear Del, I do believe that another term for "damped" would be absorbed. In either case, I believe that we may agree that the softer the material, the more this will occur. On a molecular level, this means that not-too-tighly compacted molecules are being jostled by the vibrational energy which escapes into the rim/case, and this jostling and rubbing together of atomic elements creates friction, resulting in what we call "heat". What I am saying is that manufacturers such as Wm. Knabe and Geo.P.Bent seemed to consider this potential for energy loss in the case and rim wood as a correctible negative, and in the highly competitive atmosphere of piano building in the late 19th energy, when "no stone was left unturned" in the pursuit of "perfection", adressed it by using the most rock-hard, yet machineable woods they could find for rims and cases. Personally, I do not believe that these efforts were for nought, as I can easily hear a distinct characteristic of tone in pianos which were constructed in this fashion. And as I do not believe that dense, hard, woods are terrific resonators, I assume that it is their propensity for transmission and re-transmission of vibrations back the board, including to portions not energized by the initial shockwave, by certain frequencies, which caused this. Echoes diminish in intensity as they progress. But they do occur. In short: I believe that I can tell when a piano is built this way, merely by hearing it. And I like it. Thump __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC