Ron Nossaman wrote: > > > Oh? Is this all just for your entertainment then? > > > >Well... maybe this part... between you and me that is... I mean it has to > >be good > >for something doesnt it ?? > > Apparently not. > > >Nice duck... but out of context... the quote was in reference to you first > >saying > >they do.. then saying they dont. So whats it gonna be there Ron ?? Do you > >or do > >you not believe the Compression Crowned Soundboard Design is seriously enough > >flawed from the start off to warrant not employing its use... period. > > Yes, In my opinion, and for all the reasons I've given on this list, the > compression crowned board is badly enough flawed in structural design to > abandon altogether. > Well there you have it... looks like I understood you after all. > > >Do you or > >do you not believe that the Rib Crowned Board is superior from a > >structual point > >of view, and every bit as good from an acoustic (direction musicality) > >point of > >view ? > > Given competent design for each, again, yes, for more times than I can > remember. > Right again... but then I knew that.... > > We are now at the old news too many times repeated stage, and I'm sick of it. I kinda think we are at the "revealed" stage. But thats just me. > > Goodbye. What... again ??? Really Ron... > > Ron N > All this because its so hard to deal with somebody saying... it just doesnt add up... go figure. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC