----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Nossaman" <RNossaman@cox.net> To: <davidlovepianos@earthlink.net>; "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Bridge design > > >I notice on Steinway bridges (as well as some others) that the lower part > >of the bridge root narrows in the treble section of the piano. What is > >the design purpose of that and does it serve its purpose? > > > >David Love > > It's to get the "footprint", or attach point of the bridge to the > soundboard panel away from the rim as far as is practically possible. Yes, > it's a good idea since a bridge sitting on the rim doesn't move the > soundboard all that well. It would be nice to be able to get it even > further from the rim, but there is a practical limit in a grand determined > by hammer clearance of the belly rail, and the upper limit of the speaking > length of C-8. > > Ron N > _______________________________________________ David, The idea was certainly to reduce the size of the footprint, but it was thought to be helpful along the entire length of the bridge. The theory was that the soundboard produced "tone" by "undulating" and anything that inhibited this undulating would interfere with the tone production capability of the soundboard. A positive side effect of this practice was to move the attachment point of the bridge some away from the soundboard liner through the treble region. Taken to its illogical extreme it has the effect of reducing the stiffness of the bridge leaving it somewhat inefficient in its task as a coupler between the vibrating string and the soundboard panel. It can be a contributing factor to short-sustain problems. Typically we undercut a new treble bridge along the leading edge. This undercut extends back as far as a perpendicular line drawn straight down from the leading rows of bridge pins. We do not undercut the back side of the bridge. Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC