---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Richard Moody wrote: > > > > Sometimes there are discrepancies between original cents and > modern "adjustments". I am curious to know which source you used > for Ellis#4, if from Helmholtz, then which Ellis#4. Most > important, what cents offsets did you use? I used the offsets posted on this list that we all aggreed on that I should use. Ron Koval is useing that same set. It is consistant with the RCT offsets. > The cents offsets is necessary to determine if the whole > scale has merely been adjusted to produce A44x or if this > adjustment to A=0 inadvertently changes the "key center" from C > to A? > > What can I say... as far as RCT is capable of providing an adequate HT, then this was tuned. It came out exactly the same thing when I compared to my own manually created curves in TuneLab in which the offsets were manually entered after the curve was constructed. I am also going to read in the Jorgensen book about this tuning if its there, and see if there are good ear tests to confirm its correctness. But all in all... I gotta think its at least close enough to serve the purpose for this first little test we are doing. RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/7b/b8/d9/ce/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC