No, because it's the progression of intervals that is more important. A smooth progression of thirds, or tenths, sixths, fourths and fifths. Tuning octaves that way gives you no real reference point. David Love davidlovepianos@earthlink.net > [Original Message] > From: Charles Neuman <piano@charlesneuman.net> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Date: 1/22/2003 6:57:23 PM > Subject: aural technique for treble > > When you're tuning the treble, instead of going note by note from the top > of the temperament section to the top, why not go octave by octave? > > That is, if the temperament ends at A4, I would tune B4, and then B5, B6, > and B7. Then I'd go back and tune C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, etc. > > The main disadvantage I'd see would be that if my stretching gets too > wide, for example, I might end up so that my A's are all too sharp for the > A#'s that I tuned a while ago. Yeah, I guess that's the drawback. > > Does anyone do this? > > Charles Neuman > PTG Assoc, Long Island > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC