----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Ford" <fordpiano@earthlink.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: February 19, 2003 12:06 PM Subject: Re: Wooden action parts and frames > > >Of course, on yet the other hand, without the expanding and contracting wood > >fibers the screws might not loosen up in the first place. > > > >Del > > It was my thought that the screws might not loosen in the first > place. This, and the fact that the metal would not move around causing the bushing to get tighter or looser, were the reasons I thought there would be some advantage to it. I suppose it would be easy enough to install a few on a sample piano and find out. One thing I'm not sure about is sizing the bushing in the metal flange. I'm not sure how bushings are normally installed or sized. I believe the way Renner does it is to string several bushed flanges on a wire of some appropriate size and soak them in a solution (proprietary?) for some period of time and then let them dry on the wire. Perhaps this is only sizing the felt and so the same thing could be done with the metal flange. If it is also sizing the wood then the result might not be the same with a metal flange. ---------------------- Keeping in mind the whole while that the hammershank bushings are not typically put in the hammershank flange, but in the fork of the hammershank itself. It's the one lone exception to what would otherwise be the rule. It could be reversed if only the repetition lever upstop adjustment screw could easily (i.e., inexpensively) be relocated. The method of felt sizing you describe is pretty standard for the industry. Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC