Um, didn't Mason and Hamlin once supply dealers with a
little demonstation gadget, in which a "rib" lay on a
base between two rigids ends positiouned at exactly
the "rib's" length. The insertion of a mere business
card between one end and its stop then caused a
marked rise in the rib's center.
Thump
--- A440A@aol.com wrote:
> Ron writes:
> << Soundboard crown still isn't supported like a
> buttressed arch, Ed, and rim
> or belly rail spreading the few thousandth's
> difference between the length
> dimension measured straight from rib end to rib end,
> and that measured from
> rib end to rib end over the crown won't make the
> crown go flat. It just
> won't.<<
>
> I know that someone has done the math on this.
> How much "spread" is
> required of a rib that is 20 inches long, curved on
> a radius of say 40' to
> allow the center to drop .020"??? It has been too
> long since I dragged my
> kids through high school geometry to remember arc
> and such, but I know
> somebody out there has the answer at hand.
>
> >>Flexibility in the belly rail and rim will
> certainly damp the
> soundboard and affect tone production adversely, but
> the crown is formed
> and supported by rib and panel, independent of the
> rim. >>
>
> There is evidence for debate on the arch theory.
> The observed change in
> the Mason & Hamilin centripedal resonator when the
> strings are removed. In
> every case I have seen, (more than several),
> destringing a Mason changes the
> tension on the bars, ( judged by rattles that appear
> when destrung).
> Perhaps the strongest indication I know of that
> the arched board attempts
> to spread the case is the Chickering grands with the
> inner rim. All of these
> pianos,(I have had 4 of them), when destrung, show
> the inner rim to come
> inwards. A wedge that is very lightly placed
> between the inner and outer rim
> before stringing will be extremely tight when the
> strings are pulled up to
> pitch and the screws that pass from inner to outer
> around the perimeter will
> also be looser. There is definitely outward
> movement of the relatively
> flexible inner rim under downbearing pressure. If
> the board simply presses
> downward on the shelf, this particular construction,
> with its cantilevered
> support, would bend inwards, no? These Chickerings
> also have really nice
> sound with virtually no bearing, even though without
> any strings on them,
> there is a boatload of bearing They simply flatten
> out and I have, in the
> past, attempted to add bearing by lowering
> nosebolts,but the board just keeps
> on flattening out as I do.
> The unsupported span of the belly rail on grands
> often has a slight curve
> outwards between the horn and their attachment to
> the treble case side. I
> don't think this was built into the pianos
> originally, so what other force
> but soundboard spread would do this?
> Ed Foote RPT
> www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/
> www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info:
https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC