Testing Statistics.. was Important Question

[Don]

Hi Richard,

I was not aware that these "Stats" were available to us. The current exam
(and indeed several previous ones) required that the portions done "by ETD"
be redone aurally.

My "research" into humidity has always been flawed and likely always will
as I do not have the resources to do double blind testing. Would that I
could do it!

At 08:26 PM 9/22/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Don wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> And what are the those?
>>
>
>Those would be the ones that show how many folks pass or fail and how bad
they
>do either compared to whether they are ETD total dependants or have ear
>training.
>
>And Don, you know already all about these statistics, how formalized they
are,
>how much validity they have etc etc, what would be the likely results of a
>highly formalisation of these. Much like your own views of your own
"research"
>into the effects of Damp Chasers wouldnt you say ??? :)
>
>--
>Richard Brekne
>RPT, N.P.T.F.
>UiB, Bergen, Norway
>mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
>http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
>

Regards,
Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.M.T., R.P.T.

mailto:pianotuna@accesscomm.ca

http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/

3004 Grant Rd.
REGINA, SK
S4S 5G7
306-352-3620 or 1-888-29t-uner