Richard, I was informed, I think at the factory, or perhaps I read at some point in the PT Journal, that the nosebolt at the "Bell" was intended to be an adjustable mechanism to preserve downbearing as the board changed after leaving the factory. Also, Steinway eventually refused to make recommendations as to how much tightening was recommended, apparently understanding the risk of breaking the plate or encountering difficulties in this regard. Regards, Robin Hufford Richard Brekne wrote: > John Musselwhite wrote: > > > > > > >Richard Brekne asked > > >Does this item have a specific / proper name? > > > > > >>Del responds > > >>f there is, I don't know it. I've always heard it referred to as "the bell." > > > > US Patent #314740 - Mar 31, 1885 CFT Steinway - Grand Treble Bell. > > > > In "The Steinway Saga", Fostle mentions that the bell was inspired by the > > "Helmholtz Resonator" and indeed, I've also heard the treble bell called by > > that name, though it's a misnomer. > > > > Interestingly enough, the patent speaks in no way of this device being concieved > of as a mass coupler. Its stated purpose is rather to help keep the plate from > being pushed upwards by the strings.... at least thats what it looks like to me. > It also mentions that this imparts an increased "singing" quality to the sound of > the strings. > > Comments ? > > -- > Richard Brekne > RPT, N.P.T.F. > UiB, Bergen, Norway > mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no > http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC