The Steinway Bell Patent

Erwinspiano@aol.com Erwinspiano@aol.com
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:24:41 EDT


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 9/16/2002 11:05:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
pianobuilders@olynet.com writes:


> Subj:Re: The Steinway Bell Patent 
> Date:9/16/2002 11:05:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:pianobuilders@olynet.com">pianobuilders@olynet.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <A HREF="mailto:Erwinspiano@aol.com">Erwinspiano@aol.com</A> 
>> To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> 
>> Sent: September 16, 2002 7:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: The Steinway Bell Patent
>> 
>> 
>> In a message dated 9/14/2002 1:12:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time, <A HREF="mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no">
>> Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no</A> writes:
>> 
>> 
>> >>>          List
>>       Well I was wondering if support is the issue why not add a short 
>> stiff beam and another nose bolt. It seams like the same idea would be 
>> accomplished with less fuss.
>>       Dale Erwin
>>        Typically, we leave the bell and add a beam.  ------Del
>     
         Hi  Del
    Can you describe decernible tonal differences that you can attribute to 
the stiffness created by adding the extra beam or is just for good measure in 
hopes of supporting  the rib scale improvements etc? Also one does not wish 
to be thought of as nuts for removing such a stalwart stwy invention (the 
bell).
             Dale Erwin




---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/cc/d7/55/d0/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC