David, I am sure they will, unfortunately. Regards, Robin Hufford David Ilvedson wrote: > I would like the List to imagine the following: It's a year down the road > and Pianotech is full of postings going here and there, chatting about this > and that, a happy face after a sentence, sometimes a frown ... > > Occasionally a plaintive posting would appear on a few computers with > their filters turned off... > > "List, > > I have not received any comments to my last 20 postings! Is anyone out there...? > I'm sorry about that post concerning Ed Foote I sent last year, really I am... > So enough about me...have you heard my new equal beating temperment? > I really have outdone myself this time!" > > SidewaysWell1713@AOL.com > > Now wouldn't that be great! > > David I. > > PS. Robin, you clearly understand the modus operandi of our spewer. Unfortunately, > you are right and a Pianotech or HT newby will come along and open the box...still it is worth a try. > > ----- Original message ----------------------------------------> > From: Robin Hufford <hufford1@airmail.net> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Received: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 12:15:01 -0700 > Subject: Postings > > > One contributor to this list has a most unequal temperament, a one > >moment sweet and just and the next most sour and dissonant. Filled with > >antagonism, hatred and animosity and brimming with a pompous vanity he > >bills himself as a result of this vanity as the Sanctified Prophet of > >Equality/Inequality Expressiveness(SPEW) - a holy eminence and > >greatness destined to bring all to the light. No matter how much we > >protest that we don't care to know his particular view of unequality > >brimming as it is, with is associated meanness, and that there are > >others other who do not contaminate this particular subject and list > >with their trembling, venomous "specialness", SPEW insists on bringing > >to the discussion, for our own sake, his unique, incomprehensibly, at > >least to others, advanced but unequal view - this he must do for our > >own enlightenment. > > Either way, the greatness of SPEW is confirmed in the reactions of > >the poor, ignorant, misunderstanding masses of the list as these > >reactions confirm to himself what he believes, not withstanding his > >babbling , half-spoken claims otherwise, - he is the greatest genius of > >all time and must be recognized or else must suffer the cleansing, > >sanctifying distinction and martrydom of the misunderstood, unreceived > >and unrecognized prophet - either way the pettiness of his vile conceit > >is complete. His greatness is confirmed. > > New readers of this list will be seduced by the momentary > >rational and well stated cases to be made for his unequal view, and > >think they were participating in a discussion of an interesting, worthy > >subject, which it is, and that with a lucid, well-expressed advocate, > >and which, at the moment may well be, and who may be, at that moment, > >brimming with useful facts. . Ah, but such is not the case. An > >illusion has been created. Participants are merely the sacrificial > >lambs of the greatness of SPEW and will, indeed, come to such painful > >realization as time passes. Were they warned away by older readers of > >the list such warnings would be, pridefully, ignored as not consistent > >with their true spirit of reasonableness and understandably so, and for > >this reason I think this list should have a mechanism put in place to > >eliminate a contributor whose purposes are like those of SPEW. > > These purposes are not what they should be, which is the > >discussion of differing and, perhaps controversial, professional points > >of view, in an attempt to improve professional understanding, and, or at > >least should be, in a spirit of collegiality, but rather personal > >objectives of a mind which needs, I am sure, but sadly, disdains > >help. Such disorder then is brought to the list for its own > >purposes. > > Long time readers will know what both the forthcoming and > >numerous apologies of the past mean and have meant: SPEW is afraid of > >inattention and his unequal temperament will wax sweet and rational in > >this fear to calm the antagonism he has raised against him, for he must > >have the confused, misunderstanding and imperfect views shown in the > >posts we make to use as a canvas on which to paint his greatness for all > >to see. The best solution for this is a complete lack of response to > >any post, however informative and well expressed, as they are simply > >hooks in the water trolling to catch another victim, which will then be > >used to perpetuate the, forthcoming, vain, obsessive meanness of SPEW > >when disagreement is encountered. > > Unlike my view of the obsessive postings of SPEW, which must be > >stoically endured, I appreciate very much the original, lucid and > >rational views expressed by Ed Foote whether I agree with him or not, > >and, in general, I do, and want to express my thanks to him for setting > >the record straight and for his courage for doing so, notwithstanding > >the fact, as I am sure knew, that he would then become the target of the > >viscious abuse seen on this list lately. > > Once the storm of SPEW's abuse has ended, as it will, we should > >not be seduced by the upcoming, sincere, heart-felt apology into > >thinking, ah, now things will change with SPEW, something which, I am > >sure, we all would like. The cycle, if perpetuated by responses, will > >continue. > >Regards, Robin Hufford
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC