Ron O I must beg to differ here. I fail to see that there is anything essentially wrong with the duplex idea. It creates an effect that many like and enjoy. I also fail to understand why "getting tired of hearing about the past" seems more to mean resenting that many folks actually like much of what has been done in that past and wish for a continuance of that past. That being said, very few are against finding new ways of doing things, and I am sure we all applaud those who tread these paths. However, and as it always has been, putting something new on the market is not an easy task. Anyone who would challange the top has simply got to convince big time. I think personally, that almost everyone on this list is prepared to seek and listen to new answers and new ideas. But on the other hand, many of these same folks are not prepared at the same time to accept that some of the most successfull designs of the past are simply and hopelessly flawed. JMO RicB Ron Overs wrote: > Beautifully said Ron N. The sooner we as an industry can move on from > what may have been cutting edge over a century ago in 1872, to shift > our focus to what is possible in this century, the better. I get > rather tired of hearing about the past, when we should be critically > interested in the future. > > Thankfully, there are some on this list who are prepared to seek new > answers. Its a pleasure to read some of the contributions. > > Ron O. > -- -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC