comparing temperaments

David Ilvedson ilvey@sbcglobal.net
Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:55:59 -0700


Yikes,

I hadn't thought about that...

Carl, old buddy, talk to me first, Ok?  I'm sure we can work something out...

Davy, look before he leaps, Ilvedson


----- Original message ---------------------------------------->
From: Carl Meyer <cmpiano@attbi.com>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Received: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:51:19 -0700
Subject: Re: comparing temperaments


>Hey! David,  Maybe this could be a contract job.  I live lots closer.

>Carl the enforcer Meyer

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Ilvedson" <ilvey@sbcglobal.net>
>To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
>Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 12:25 PM
>Subject: Re: comparing temperaments


>> And in this corner, "wearing the darling blue trunks, weighing in at 90 pounds,
>> Billy, the whinner, Bremmer."  "And in the red trunks, weighing in at 200 pounds,
>> Eddy, the mouth, Foote."
>>
>> "Break when I say and no hitting below the belt, well, from now on"
>>
>> Davy, did I write that? Ilvedson
>>
>> "Who needs a flame-suit when I live hundreds of miles away"
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original message ---------------------------------------->
>> From: Avery Todd <avery@ev1.net>
>> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
>> Received: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:31:27 -0500
>> Subject: Re: comparing temperaments
>>
>> >Oh s***. Here we go again!
>>
>> >Avery
>>
>> >At 08:43 PM 08/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
>> >>Sheesh!  I won't do Ed Foote's writing the honor of copying it.  As usual,
>> >>the intent is to discredit and as usual, he knows absolutely nothing about
>> >>what he is writing.  If Ed *could* tune the EBVT, which he couldn't, even
>> >>if his life depended on it, he'd know that all of what he wrote has no
>> >>foundation.
>> >>
>> >>I posted Jason Kanter's graph on my website because as a graph, I've never
>> >>seen better.  It runs circles around the ones that Ed has done.  While I
>> >>honestly do not understand why virtually none of the numbers guys can ever
>> >>get things really right, I appreciate their efforts.
>> >>
>> >>The EBVT is a true Well Tempered Tuning and does not have the kind of
>> >>imbalances which Jason graphed and Ed seized upon to try once again to
>> >>discredit what I've been doing for 10 years.
>> >>
>> >>The fact is that it has 4 pure 5ths, the same 4 pure 5ths that *any*
>> >>historically documented  Well Tempered Tuning has.  The other nearly pure
>> >>5ths are also right along the lines of what any Well Tempered Tuning would
>> >>have.  *Anyone* can create a Well Tempered Tuning by tuning a chain of
>> >>pure 5ths from C about half the way through the cycle of 5ths, then temper
>> >>the rest of the 5ths so that they all will fit.  It's as simple as that.
>> >>
>> >>But there are some people who just cannot tune by ear.  They've just got
>> >>to go dialing in numbers on an ETD and hope that what comes out will sound
>> >>good.  That's what Ed does and until my dying day, I promise to myself and
>> >>the world that I won't do it.  I tune by *listening* to the piano and
>> >>sorting out the compromises I must make according to my own plan and sense
>> >>of what sounds good to my ear based on a lifetime of 50 years of interest
>> >>in, practice and performance of music.  I do not depend upon a calculation
>> >>which I have no control over.
>> >>
>> >>What I manage to do with my EBVT is create a mild, Victorian style
>> >>temperament and still retain some of the properties of earlier
>> >>temperaments, namely 4 pure 5ths, which no other Victorian Temperament,
>> >>including the Moore does.  This is accomplished by breaking the chain of
>> >>pure 5ths that earlier WT's have and which create extreme harshness, which
>> >>ultimately makes them unacceptable.  Instead of having an unbroken chain
>> >>of pure 5ths, C-F-Bb-Eb-Ab-Db-Gb(F#), I offer C-F-Bb and F# -C# -G#.  The
>> >>5ths in between are tempered but less so than in ET.
>> >>
>> >>It follows all of the rules of Well Tempered Tuning and is in no way a
>> >>"sideways well" as Ed proclaims.  Owen Jorgensen approved of my work when
>> >>I presented it to him 10 years ago and that alone, is good enough for
>> >>me.  Dr. Herbert Anton Kellner, a well known temperament guru became aware
>> >>of my work and praised it, calling it "genius".  He said that the Equal
>> >>Beating and Proportionate Beating found in my temperament, the sets of 3,
>> >>6, 8, 9 & 12 beats per second were in concert with the very pulse of humanity.
>> >>
>> >>Yes, all of the beat speeds are exact multiples of 1 beat per second.  I
>> >>arrange all harmony in the piano to fall within these very regular and
>> >>orderly patterns.  Yet Ed says that is not right for 18th & 19th Century
>> >>music.
>> >>
>> >>I'd rather listen to the opinion of a man who has been studying and
>> >>practicing this art since the 1930's than to a Johnny-come-lately who
>> >>first was inspired by these ideas when he attended the Convention in
>> >>Milwaukee (where the EBVT was first presented to PTG).  And of course, Ed
>> >>condemns that event too as he did the 1/7 Comma Meantone at the 1995
>> >>Convention.  Soon thereafter however, he is *teaching* it and producing
>> >>CD's to promote it.  Sure, I like Ed's CD's, except for the Chopin in
>> >>Reverse Well and the Mozart in Meantone but the comments of listeners are
>> >>certainly not unanimously full of praise.
>> >>
>> >>I'm not interested in trying to discover what the right "correction
>> >>figures" for the EBVT are because I know that even if they were figured
>> >>out, the octaves would still be wrong.  I tune my octaves in a way which
>> >>Ed denounces as not making any sense at all but I'm still doing them that
>> >>way, have been for 20 years and always will.  Sooner or later, Ed will be
>> >>*teaching* it. He'll find some other source which says the same thing and
>> >>proclaim it to be the bees knees of tuning and he'll still try to find a
>> >>way to say that what I do is wrong.
>> >>
>> >>So, others who want to try to figure out what those numbers should be are
>> >>encouraged to keep trying.  It shouldn't be that hard.  The EBVT is
>> >>constructed much like many other HT's.  But what really makes me skeptical
>> >>is that if today, so many people who really want to find the right
>> >>numerical values can't, then how good are all those published sets of
>> >>numbers?  Not that I dispute any particular one but really, I would never
>> >>want to even try to tune a piano that way, Ed's way.
>> >>
>> >>I'll say one thing without reservation.  I can tune a better sounding
>> >>piano than Ed Foote can and I could have it half done by the time it would
>> >>take him to finish dialing in his numbers.
>> >>
>> >>Anybody want to give me a chance to prove it?
>> >>
>> >>Bill Bremmer RPT
>> >>Madison, Wisconsin
>> >><http://www.billbremmer.com/>Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r .
>> >>c o m =-
>>
>>
>>
>>





This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC