Older plastic was not very well developed, either
Thump
--- "Kevin E. Ramsey" <kevin.e.ramsey@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Well, when you think about it, the force from
> the key goes through the elbow at a ninety degree
> angle, and ALL of the force goes through the elbow.
> So, as I see it, that part gets more of the stress
> than any action part in the piano, with the
> exception of the hammer, but then, why don't we see
> more hammer flanges break? Could be that they have a
> greater sectional density than that thin and long
> elbow.
>
>
>
> I guess the elbows get more of an "impact" on them
> than the flanges.
>
> At 04:20 PM 10/23/02 -0400, you wrote:
> >That all makes perfectly good sense. However,
> many of the ones I have run
> across (should have run over?) have never had a
> damp chaser installed.
> >Perhaps they would have fallen apart sooner if
> they had. Still the
> flanges, etc. lasted far better than the elbows.
> Maybe just wear & tear
> from the movement?
> >Fran Helms
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC