I didn't mean it that way. I meant that assuming you could set the downbearing as needed regardless of the position of the aliquots, in other words by adjusting their thickness. David Love ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Ford" <fordpiano@earthlink.net> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: November 19, 2002 8:35 AM Subject: Re: S&S D Duplex On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:49:41 -0800 David Love <davidlovepianos@earthlink.net> wrote: > Quick question about this duplex thing. Let's > just say for arguments sake > that you didn't think that tuning the duplex is > important, necessary, or > even desirable. Then, on a Steinway, would the > best position for the rear > duplex aliquots (bearing considerations aside) > be that which gives the > greatest backscale length? In other words, > would you push the aliquots back > as far as possible and grind them down > accordingly to give the proper > downbearing setting? > > David Love David, If you thought that the duplex was undesirable and bearing wasn't a consideration then I would say the best place for the aliquots would be some place other than in the piano. Phil F _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC