Bill writes: >What would really interest me is finding that when first >partials in the speaking length and the duplex length have a harmonic >relationship, that this accordance allows the standing waves on >either side of the bridge to stand longer. I wonder if the duplexes have more effect via instantaneous impedance changes in the bridge than actually producing much sound on their own. Out of phase phenomena cause some profound effects on vibrating bodies. One thing that seems to be missing from the discussion is the voicing. I have noticed the duplex scales creating more and more effect as the hammers in a given piano become harder and harder. This is particularly evident in one studio that I tune. A Hamburg B. When we began using it, in 1998, the hammers were on the verge of being too soft for the tracking use the piano was meant for. I thought it sounded really great with all the duplex strings unmuted,(they had been taped off previously, but needing all the brilliance I could get, I opened them up). As the years have gone by, the hammers have packed down, and the piano now zings pretty heavily. We have resorted to taping the duplexes back up,(they really, really, have an aversion to me softening the hammers, even when I point out that it sure sounded good two years ago). The contribution of the backstrings, and the front duplexes, seems to depend on the hammers. A soft hammer, with the duplexes, gives a broad tonal range. A soft hammer without the duplexes sounds dead. A hard hammer with the duplexes zings and whistles, A hard hammer without the duplexes sounds hard and empty, (which is what seems to please the producers most!) Regards, Ed Foote RPt
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC