> 5. If, as you say, only your dog will be able to tell over much of the scale, > why does Steinway choose to put them only in that part of the scale where your > dog would be able to tell? Same reason you find a rear spoiler on a 115 hp Honda automobile. It doesn't make 'em go any faster, but rather it makes them sell faster. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phillip Ford" <fordpiano@earthlink.net> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 1:24 PM Subject: Re: S&S D Duplex > On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:56:12 -0500 Stephen Birkett > <sbirkett@real.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > > > In his patent, Theodore Steinway indicates a > > quite different function for > > the front and rear duplexes (or should we say > > duplices).... > > > As for the rear duplex he > > notes that transverse vibrations will not pass > > the bridge termination, on > > account of its rigidity. However, he notes that > > longitudinal vibrations > > will pass the bridge, and designs the rear > > duplex section to provide a > > multiple of 1/2 speaking length behind to > > bridge. To paraphrase his > > reasoning, this will bring the longitudinal > > whistling noises into better > > harmony with the string fundamental. [not > > passing comment on the validity > > of his argument here - that is a different > > story - only your dog will be > > able to tell for much of the scale]. > > > > So, to summarize CFT's reasoning ... > > ...REAR the only function > > of the rear duplex is to > > eliminate non-harmonic whistling by tuning a > > longitudinal mode. In this > > patent, then, both duplices were intended by > > CFT to be tuned. > > > > Hmmm. The patent is quite specific on these > > points. > > > > Stephen > > > > Stephen, > We've been over a lot of this in the not too distant past. But, at the risk > of repeating what may already be in the archives, I'll make a few comments. > > 1. Steinway's current building practice (and the practice for many decades) > is to define the length of the front duplex by the plate casting. Since this > is not tunable, they are at odds with their own patent. You might say that > they are 'pre-tuned' if you precisely controlled the plate casting and > precisely controlled the speaking lengths of the strings by plate and bridge > placement. But neither of these things is the case, especially not at > Steinway. > > 2. CFT seems pretty clear that he intends the rear duplex to deal with > longitudinal vibrations, not transverse vibrations. If I am not mistaken, the > people who are talking about tuning the rear duplex are talking about moving > the aliquot to make the back scale length such that its TRANSVERSE vibration > is a harmonic of that of the speaking length. Once again, this seems to be at > odds with the sacred patent. One could make an argument that doing this type > of tuning is a good idea and will yield positive results, but it seems to me > that one would not be justified in using this patent as beatification of that > practice. > > 3. If longitudinal vibrations can pass the bridge, it seems to me that they > can just as easily pass the aliquot. So the aliquot position is irrelevant. > The plate pin becomes the relevant thing. In order to actually tune this > portion of the string for longitudinal vibrations you would need to have a > movable plate pin. This feature has not been incorporated into any piano that > I have seen. > > 4. Assuming that you could tune this portion of the string for longitudinal > vibration, how do you go about tuning something that only your dog can hear? > And, assuming that we now have machines that could hear this for us, how did > they go about doing this back in CFT's day? > > 5. If, as you say, only your dog will be able to tell over much of the scale, > why does Steinway choose to put them only in that part of the scale where your > dog would be able to tell? > > Phil F > > > Phillip Ford > Piano Service & Restoration > 1777 Yosemite Ave - 215 > San Francisco, CA 94124 > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC