I understand the pianist feels a mix between the tactile feed back from the action and the sound coming from the instrument. A experimental study was made on what is the most important parameter for the ^pianist, and it appears clearly it was the action & regulation, before the tone of the instrument . See Alex Galembo site : Perception of Musical Instrument by Performer and Listener (with application to the piano) http://www.engineeringandmusic.de/individu/galealex/gaalproc.html More than very interesting I find. The best Iz OZ OLEG > >Another very important point we are leaving out in all > this is the whole > >discussion about how pianists "feel" the voice of the > piano. To what > >degree this > >is purely a psychological phenomena or not does not change > the fact that there > >is a real and undeniable connextion here which clouds all our > >musings about how > >an action plays and feels. It seems to me an underexplored > area of great > >interest and bearing to such disscussion. > > Franz Mohr's "spielart". I've always pictured it as an impedance > matching between the forces in the action (friction, inertia, and > gravity) and the force which the pianist can apply. The > pianist/machine of course has a brain and a heart attached to it, > complicating the engineering study. > > Bill Ballard RPT > NH Chapter, P.T.G. > > "taken beyond the proper balance ('power and musical tone'). > additional power comes always at the expense of tone quality, a > sacrifice no designer or piano technician should ever > willingly make." > ...........Del Fandrich, on priorities in the design > of console > pianos in the 'Piano Technicians Journal' (4/98) > +++++++++++++++++++++ > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC