Touchweight Metrology Question

[David Love]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Of course, it was a different hammer than they produce now.  Didn't need =
any lacquer.  Had nice resilience and tension.  And do you think they =
did a bit better job of bellying back then?

I trust the cape was pleasant.

David Love
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Erwinspiano@AOL.COM=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: May 24, 2002 6:32 PM
  Subject: Re: Touchweight Metrology Question


  In a message dated 5/20/2002 7:33:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, =
davidlovepianos@earthlink.net writes:



    Subj:Re: Touchweight Metrology Question=20
    Date:5/20/2002 7:33:59 AM Pacific Standard Time
    From:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
    Reply-to:pianotech@ptg.org
    To:pianotech@ptg.org
    Sent from the Internet=20



    I was being a bit facetious about Horowitz, the point was more to =
convey
    that I think McMorrow's views should not to be totally ridiculed in =
terms of
    quality of tone.

    David Love


            Hi David

     Good point and frankly how many folks have enjoyed the sounds of =
20's Steinways or older that have the typically light Steinway hammers =
and the pianos, in most cases, sound more than beefy and adequate and =
musically enjoyable.
  >>>>>Dale Erwin>>...


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a2/78/a2/6a/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--