At 11:18 AM 5/12/02 -0700, you wrote: >Whichever, the point was that it didn't quite fit correctly whereas another >manufacturer's parts might have. > >David Love > Hi David, A personal observation. When mix and match parts seem to be in the equation, thats when the real geometry problems raises it's ugly head. I have found several Steinway's, of the teflon era, that have had Renner hammers and shanks replaced, with the original wippens retained. In each case the results have been disasterous. When ever I have replaced both wips and shanks with a single manufacturer's products, the out come has been satisfactory. Our proceedure is as follows. 1. Refurbish, and rebush the keys and key bed.Get the friction even in this area. 2. Do a touch weight analysis, on the old action parts. 3. Do sample touch weight analysis with, American, Japanese, and German parts. Using sample hammers of the type I will be ordering,at 4 points across the scale. This method makes the outcome very predictable, with minimum lead weighting changes. Unless I have felt the front weight is tooooooooo high to start with. It's not unusual to be able to remove some lead on the teflon era actions. If you spot 6 leads per key in the lower bass, you have an opportunity to dramatically improve the action with careful parts selection. Just my 2 cents worth. Regards Roger Roger Jolly Balwin Yamaha Piano Centres. Saskatoon/Regina. Canada.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC