Hammer changing

[Erwinspiano@AOL.COM]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 3/29/2002 7:45:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, avery@ev1.net 
writes:


> Subj:Re: Hammer changing 
> Date:3/29/2002 7:45:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:avery@ev1.net">avery@ev1.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
>   Uhhhhhhhhhhh Yes but have any of you priced these wonderful parts. I 
> heard were talking a thousand bucks or more. He does have a point. Yamaha 
> seems to be mighty proud of this product.

>>>>>Dale Erwin>>>>>>>>.

> 
> Especially with a piano that costs as much as a CFIII does!!!!
> 
> Avery
> 
> At 01:22 PM 03/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >It will be cheaper to buy Yamaha hammers already hung on shanks not as
> >separate pieces.
> >
> >That being said, do remember that cheap does not always equate to good
> >tone.
> >
> >I would recommend Abel or Renner.
> >
> >Why are these hammers in such bad shape?  Yamaha hammers are usually
> >very long lasting.  If these hammers are worn badly then replace the
> >shanks as well.  Bear in mind that the cost of parts is far less an
> >issue than ending up with a superior finished piano.  The cost of parts
> >is passed on to the customer and should not be your choice but that of
> >the customer.
> >
> >Remember your reputation rides on the work you do.
> >
> >                 Newton
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/43/45/4b/dc/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--