After so many years tuning all kinds of pianos in various conditions including numerous pitch raises of grands, uprights new pianos old pianos and factory pianos I have developed my own system as I'm sure we all have with experience. But for someone looking for answers in the first 5 to 10 years in the field to say one needs experience is almost to admit that there is no scientific way to attack the problem. The various comments by our colleagues are pretty much on the money as far as I have read so far but there may be a few angles that I have missed, so I'd like to hear your reaction to these ideas: Science vs. art. If we were to think of pitch raising as a science all of the numbers mentioned going down to cents of accuracy would be appropriate. But refining this approach semms to me to need an equation that might be a long as the road from here to Chicago. Not being mathematically oriented primarily I resort to the "art" of tuning and pitch raises taking into consideration certain factors that I put in the pot of my head and try to stir up into a "feel" solution. These factors are: the length of time the piano has been below pitch. The age of the piano. The reasons the piano has dropped. The tightness of the pins. And the condition of the action. The last may be the most critical. Why? Because if you raise the pitch substantially and attempt to set the string tension with severe test blows you may have more work than necessary repairing broken action parts. Before I caluculate cents, I always calculate dollars; meaning. as some techs have astutely pointed out, you can"t do a pitch raise and a fine tuning in one shot. If the general pitch of the piano is at A 438 or lower, or conversely A 442 or above, in my experience two passes are required in almost every case. If in addition to those conditins you are dealing with a concert situation you may have to tune the piano again right before the concert. If it is a home or showroom situation I generally recommend a week to two weeks before i do a follow up tuning which I have come to consider mandatory in the cases of pianos outside those perameters. In sum that's why i consider certain phases of piano tuning from an artistic rather than a scientific point of view. You really have to develop an "x" sense of acoustical aim rather than a strict mathematical formula in this case. At least that is what I have tried to do, and for the most part have succeded. The last point that may be useful is my suggestion of severe test blows which is as follows: When I have a piano that I am doing a pitch raise on I first ascertain if the action can take the "action" . I generally try to go about halfway above the pitch that the piano was below it, with the exception of instruments that are a semitone or more below. I think you are right that too much stretching isn't good for the strings, but you'd be surprised to know how much stretch relatively new strings can take. I tend to think that in the case of pianos of five to ten years life the strings might "like" a good stretch after the atrophy of lying at a much lower tension than they were designed to sustain. After this initial pitch raise I go from top to bottom with both hands striking the keys in octaves at least five times each with as stong a blow as I can. My objective is to strike the keys at least as hard as a pianist. This severe test blow procedure may be rough on your elbows and fingers but it does wonders for evening out the tension through all the points of contact the string engages. Hope this has been helpful. Dan Franklin Duplexdan
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC