This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi David. Why convert this ? I believe that the rocker system has less friction = and better feel for control on the action than the capstan one (because, = I think, the key never looses contact with the whippen). The only = drawback of this system is that you spend much more time servicing it. = But with improved skill, you can reduce it to normal. Regards, St=E9phane Collin. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Love=20 To: Pianotech=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:52 PM Subject: Bechstein Rocker Capstan I am considering converting a Bechstein Rocker Arm capstan arrangement = (1910, IV) to a standard capstan configuration. Any suggestions or = warnings before I pursue it further. David Love ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ac/f0/8c/14/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC