---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 7/16/2002 5:31:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, davidlovepianos@earthlink.net writes: > Subj:Re: Shellac vs. lacquer > Date:7/16/2002 5:31:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net">davidlovepianos@earthlink.net</A> > Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > David > I agree with this. The whole crux of the matter is that maximum > resielence won't get max piano tone. What is required is limited resielence > or controlled stiffness. Solutions coat and stiffen fibers and when done > enough the density increase to the level of resielence control/stiffness > needed to produce a desired tone/ sound. >>>>>Dale Erwin>>>>>>> > > This is all assuming that the contribution of "hammer hardeners" is to > increase stiffness of the individual fibers rather than overall density of > the hammer. I'm inclined to believe that it's the overall density that > increases and the flexibility or compressibility decreases as a function of > that. > > David Love > ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/8a/8b/7f/db/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC