At 6:48 AM -0600 1/24/02, Cy Shuster wrote: >I'd type more of the liner notes, but they're copyrighted. A key point is >"a vibrating string in a piano takes on a substantial movement in the >unstruck direction shortly after it receives the blow from the piano >hammer." The first thing I noticed on visiting the Wapin site was the extreme angle of the non-perpendicular pin in his background logo. There are pianos where the pin angle is quite marked, but this has never been the rule for all makers. Two Lipp pianos I am working on at the moment, and all other Lipps, which of all pianos I know are worthy of the "golden toned" epithet and which sing strongly right up through the treble, have the bridge pins at a very small angle to the perpendicular compared to most pianos; besides this the pins are unusually high, protruding six or seven millimetres from the bridge face. As usual, Wapin's comparison is made with Steinway as the benchmark and his wave patterns compare an unmodified Steinway with a modified one. I have had more trouble with poor singing quality in the Steinway treble than most makes except the Bösendorfer, most of which have a terrible decay problem. It strikes me that the main thing about the Wapin arrangement is the near perpendicular disposition of the front pin. Without reading right through the patent I can't be sure if he says anything about the way the "bearing point edge" is cut and whether a small vertical drop is desirable (a feature Wolfenden admires in the practice of one maker, probably Ibach) or whether this angle should be at least steep, as it certainly is not on the Steinway. The "a third pin" of the "preferred" arrangement is a secondary item in the patent claim, so the main thing is the perpendicularity of the front pin. Now it is not necessary to repin the bridge to achieve this effect but simply to file the front pin perpendicular for the first <1.5 mm of its height, and this could easiy be done using a suitable small diamond file in combination with a feeler gauge to avoid damage to the bridge face. It would be quick and easy to test the effect on a less than crucial restring job. The addition of a third pin, if it's worth it, would be a simple matter. It is quite likely there is some sense in the Wapin arrangement, but I think the bridge cutting and the position of the pin in relation to this is also most important and it's quite possible that the height of the pin above the string also has some effect. Bad contact at the bridge or the stud can, as we all know, have very bad tonal effects, and the first thing I do with any piano that comes under my care is to knock the strings down on the bridge, thus removing almost always some of the worst tonal problems the customer is complaining about. I imagine that with a perfectly vertical pin, this bad coupling problem wight need to be dealt with more frequently, but that's just guessing. JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC