Hi Keith, I would like to thank your for sharing your thoughts and experiences with us. And I would also like to express my desire for your continued success in developing all aspects of your tuning skills. A very refreshing post to my mind. Thanks again RicB Keith Hamilton wrote: > Are the calculated tunings better than the RCT or SAT III on > challanging (small) pianos? YES! Are they better than I can get > using SAT III along with aural techniques and checking? Depends on > my ear that day, but I would say that with time and training, NO. > > I have decided to keep the SAT III, work on my aural techniques, > and be a "happer" tuner not a machine calculated tuner. I feel I > will get more job satisfaction in the long run. > > Who knows? I may even get up enough confidence to go back to > aural only tunings! Wouldn't that be something! > > Questions? Have my reasons been made clear? > If not --- ASK! (these are my opinions and my opinions ONLY) > > Keith Hamilton, RPT > Youngstown, OH > w8gx@arrl.net -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC