RB: Perhaps I was confused by your statement: "Certainly Ron N makes a valid point. Piano techs ofte times display the same kind of lack of understanding about the instrument as pianists do." I didn't feel that a difference of opinion that Ron mentioned necessarily implied a lack of understanding. There are valid differences of opinion about some things that might confuse pianists without a technical understanding. I took that as his point, not that piano techs often lack an understanding of their instrument. David Love ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: December 30, 2002 10:04 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Aural versus ETD tuning training > David Love wrote: > > Was that Ron's point? I didn't read it that way. > > David Love Well I would think it is plenty reasonable enough to read the following quote --- "And that's not even taking into account that pianists will get different answers to the same question posed to different piano techs." ---- from Rons post in the direction I took it. But if you first want to start pecking at grammatics, I would like to point out that I made no direct reference to what Rons point was or wasnt. I simply said he made a valid point. And then I went on to make a couple of my own. Guess this goes to show how easy it is to "read" someone elses words in about as many ways as you can think of when it comes down to it. Sorry if you got confused. RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC