At 07:57 PM 16/04/02 -0400, Charles wrote: >As for the rule, I understand the point of keeping people from creating >their own levels of superiority, but I think that rule raised some freedom >of speach issues. If I recall the original rule read something like "Members shall not advertise that their method of tuning is superior to others." I don't remember it mentioning ETAs at all. It was in effect when I joined the Guild along with a number of other good things that ultimately went by the wayside. The intent had nothing to do with free speech, but rather it was to prevent people from advertising that they were better tuners than their peers for any reason. That's merely professional courtesy anyway. >Now, as for what's next... Will someone be prohibited from saying, "WT is >better than ET?" Sorry, I couldn't resist... :) The day that happens I'll return my membership card. Temperaments are another tool we can use to make pianos sound better. I think we all have an obligation to understand how that tool is used, even if we don't use it ourselves. Incidentally, I've been keeping the Moore Representative Victorian on the 64 note spinet beside my desk here and it definitely sounds better than it does when I try to force it into something resembling ET. I'm curious about whether having just two strings per note on a short-scale piano lends itself more towards HTs rather than ET. Any comments? Anyway, I hope that clarifies this a little. I'm sure one of the elder statespeople will correct me if I'm wrong about the advertising rule. John
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC