more on this temperament thing

[Farrell]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
I would sure like to hear more on this topic. As a tuner still on a =
steep learning curve, I wonder just what I should be doing with my =
octaves, but I find that the SAT III is either right where I wish it to =
be, or sometimes I do find that it seems to have calculated a tuning =
with too much stretch, and I have to enter negative numbers in the DOB =
to slow the beating down - occasionally quite a bit.

Terry Farrell =20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: David Love=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 11:25 AM
  Subject: Re: more on this temperament thing


  My experience suggests that C8 at 43+ is not a conservative stretch =
but a fairly healthy one.  To my ear, I usually reduce the stretch (on =
the SATIII via the DOB).   On concert grands I seem to prefer it a bit =
under 40.   On smaller grands and uprights, in the mid 30's.  Of course =
the general scaling does make a difference.  But generally I find the =
standard setting on a SATIII over stretches.  I am curious what other =
people find.

  David Love=20
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: David M. Porritt=20
    To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
    Sent: October 21, 2001 7:40 AM
    Subject: Re: more on this temperament thing


    Bill:

    You've talked quite a bit of your "tempered octaves" but as one who =
has seen everything from 2:1 octaves to outrageously stretched octaves I =
don't know what kind of stretch you're talking about.  Could you give us =
some numbers so we can know what you mean by tempered octaves? =20

    For example, when I tune a Steinway D my C6 is stretched to 5.06, C7 =
is 16.11, and C8 is 43.84.  This is what I consider a conservative =
tuning.  What kind of numbers do you get?  On any piano, just measure =
your C6, 7, & 8 and tell us what model piano it is, and how it stretches =
with your tempered octaves.  That would be very informative.

    Thanks,

    dave
    *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

    On 10/21/01 at 7:19 AM Billbrpt@AOL.COM wrote:
      In a message dated 10/21/01 6:07:55 AM Central Daylight Time, =
davidlovepianos@earthlink.net (David Love) writes:=20



        That being said, if the pianist needs an altered tuning to =
create excitement, he should practice more.


      It's always been my belief, as a piano technician that the better =
prepared the piano, the better equipped the artist is.  Remember that I =
have not advocated *HT* as such for Jazz.  To you, this implies =
*altered* tuning which means something quite noticeably different and =
thus creates an *interference* with what you do rather than provide an =
enhancement.=20

      I don't know if you can or have tried my EBVT but as I have =
designed it (with Tempered Octaves), it is meant to enhance your =
playing, not shock or disturb your musical sensibilities.  It is meant =
to provide definition, texture and clarity, not weird, jarring and =
shocking dissonances.  If the EBVT is still to *altered* for you, I =
believe you might benefit from the Marpurg (also with my Tempered =
Octaves system).  I will give your piano an uncanny clean, crisp and =
clear sound but absolutely will not create any distinction between keys. =


      Bill Bremmer RPT=20
      Madison, Wisconsin
_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/8f/32/51/6a/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--