>>What i did say is that I believe [!!] bridges are transparent to longitudinal >>modes.........highly unlikely that any external clamping mechanism >>will be able to prevent the internal wave transmission past it, as >>long as the molecular structure is continuous. Transmission waves >>simply pass right past these clamped bits. They will eventually be >>reflected when they reach the geometric and physical _end_ of the >>bar, or localized discontinuities. > >This contradicts Conklin's finding (which I have verified) that the >frequency of the wave is a function of the speaking length. As I >mentioned yesterday, the propping up of the speaking length with a >_simple_ bridge, by which I mean the equivalent of a low violin >bridge, is of course adequate to change the base frequency of the >transverse waves but will not affect that of the compression wave. >By contrast, anything in the nature of a firm clamp, which includes >the clamping effect of a piano bridge, does serve as a termination >(broadly speaking) of the wire with respect also to the main >compression wave. I say nothing of its harmonics, since I haven't >tested these. This is very similar to the results I just got with a quick and dirty monochord. A round, unanchored "bridge" didn't much affect LM1, but a solidly anchored pinned bridge, like one found in an actual "modern" piano, produces an LM1 dependant on the speaking length. A piano like bridge doesn't, by my observation, seem to be transparent to LM. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC