Duplex

[Ron Nossaman]

>Hmmm.. your last question is a kind of strange one... because it asks how some
>condition (which can not exist, by your reasoning, in the first place) can 
>result
>in a given effect which can only exist if the first condition
exists...which it
>cant... if you are correct... grin. Kind of a no win situation for the other 
>guys.

While I don't care who "wins" here, yes. That's what I've been saying. The
claims of proponents are contradictory to what I think I know about physics.



>What I would like to know is whether or not the results claimed by the 
>proponets of
>the tuned rear duplex idea are indeed resultant given that the conditions 
>can and
>do exist, even hypothetically.

I can't prove that either way, to my satisfaction or that of anyone else.
>From what I've done, and the results I've gotten, I'll leave them out
pending what I consider to be better results.



>  After answering that then we could get into 
>whether
>or not its feasable in real life or not, or even worth it.

Since the previous question isn't ever going to be answerable to everyone's
satisfaction, neither will the feasibility or reward question. Folks will
think what they wish, or believe what they believe by their own criteria.
That criteria very often differs from mine. 


>I will read through the patent supplied by Clark tonite.... sigh... so much 
>to do
>all the time...:)

We're falling behind in ways we aren't even aware of yet.

Ron N