YC Strike Weights etc

Richard Brekne Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:04:53 +0100


Sxuse me... looks like we both made that type error... SWR of 5.3 and medium
heavy SW range goes together perfectly.... 0.53 of course is nonsensical for a
SWR figure.

RicB


David Love wrote:

> SWR at .53 doesn't make sense.  That number usually ranges from 5 - 7.
>
> David Love
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no>
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: November 09, 2001 1:33 AM
> Subject: Re: YC Strike Weights etc
>
> > David Love wrote:
> >
> > > By setting all the key ratios at .53 do you actually get uniform SWR in
> such
> > > a case, or does the difference between the contact points on the wippen
> heal
> > > with varied capstan lines throw that off a bit.  If you are trying to
> get
> > > uniform SWR, wouldn't the key ratio between sharps and naturals have to
> be
> > > slightly different?
> > >
> > > David Love
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > I dont think he said he was setting all the key ratios at 0.53 (correct me
> if I
> > am wrong David) He is setting a new Strike Weight ratio at 0.53 and thats
> > something different.  What Key Ratio he hasnt said, tho he did mention
> that the
> > capstans / heels are staggered.
> >
> > I sometimes have to read twice or thrice to make sure whether David is
> refering
> > to the Key Ratio, or the Strike Weight Ratio.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Richard Brekne
> > RPT, N.P.T.F.
> > Bergen, Norway
> > mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
> >
> >




--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no




This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC