Del wrote: > >To the best of my knowledge it has never been tested in any way. I have > > never believed this to be true though I've certainly heard it often enough. >> I've always felt it was just a way to make the noises that couldn't be taken >> away and kept away palatable to the performer and/or owner. Kind of like >> telling the artist that his seat is the worst one in the house and the piano >> really sounds best about ten or twelve rows back. If that is truly the case > > we should all be ashamed of ourselves. Exactly Del, dosen't it all sound just a bit like a excuse. No matter how noises are justified with explanations of how it helps so called projection, it's still noise. It ain't musical as you rightly pointed out in another post. Richard wrote: >Well, I have seen a demonstration on three occasions now where a >Steinway D and >a Yamaha CFIII have been on the same stage, and 20 meters back or more the >Yamaha fades out and becomes difuse... Maybe, but it wouldn't have a thing to do with the front duplexes, since both Steinway and Yamaha try to get the front duplexes to tune. So the difference has to be somewhere else. Ron O -- ______________________________ Website: http://www.overspianos.com.au Email: mailto:ron@overspianos.com.au ______________________________
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC