Carl Meyer wrote: > I'll quit beating this dead horse since it seems like a large number of > world citizens are uncomfortable and threatened by the idea of freedom and > its related responsibility. They choose to live in a nanny state and trade > freedom for what they think is security. Now that will be just about enough. Your rant has been fun enough...but you have moved beyond that to the degree of being insulting. > Now I'm more than happy to support > their right to make those decisions. I just wish they could tone down their > evangelistic fervor in trying to prevent us from making the decision to > embrace what they have rejected. I might suggest you practice what you preach. The only evangelistic fervor has come from your corner. I simply stated what things were like here in a response a fair and simple querry. I also stated quite clearly that I thought there were enough pros and cons for both types of solutions that all in all they balanced out pretty evenly...albiet in different ways. I ended by saying that I personally like the particular end result here and that that said more about me then it said about anything else.. Now how you turn that into some kind of evangelistic fervor in some attempt to prevent others from making up their own minds is beyond me. But please... if you cant dissagree without haveing to resort to calling people and nations (allied ones at that) nasty little names, putting words and meanings into their mouths that they were not even close to saying... then... well just ditch it. > Yes, that's my final answer! fine. we all know where you stand Carl... you dont have to beat us over the head with it... > Carl -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC