Bill I believe upright hammer bore rake is induced so that the hammer can hit the string without having the shank travel any further towards the upright position which would slow repition. On the uprights that have displayed this problem for me,even with low friction and every thing regulated the return spring could not do all the work. So even though upright actions are primarily (or More)spring operated for repetition they still require some gravity to aid responsive shank return/repetition. Dale Erwin ----- Original Message ----- From: <Maxpiano@AOL.COM> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 6:03 AM Subject: Re: Strike angle (was Bore Distance) > I've replaced shanks on many old uprights that had the hammer head at less > than 90 degrees to the shank. I would guess at 85 degrees on some, and I had > to go with that angle to make them fit and look right. What was the reason > for this angle? > > An institution I serve has three Steinway 45 studios with hammers so angled > that, as they groove, are striking more and more on the "forehead" of the > hammer than on the "nose." I do not care for the sound of these pianos, sort > of nasty and twangy, not to speak of the abundant false beats. Was the angle > intentional? For what purpose? > > Bill Maxim > Maxim Piano Service > 212 Newpark Place > Columbia, SC 29212-8666 > (803) 732-9225, FAX (803) 732-2641 > wmaxim@aol.com >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC