> > I gotta admit I see a lot of parallels between how present day techs react to > this idea of multipartial displays and how yesteryears techs reacted to ETD's > in general... Here's my reaction. Your idea would be better served by attempting to answer a few of the questions of practical concern I asked you before you conclude that you are ahead of your time and we narrow minded dinosaurs are just being resistant to new ideas. It's easy enough to sit in a chair and dream of wonderful and magical things, and easier yet to wave away the technical and organizational considerations necessary to produce those things when someone else is expected to actually make them happen. I know all about it. My own wish list is considerably longer and less practical than my personal reality will allow. > > I think I will drop this for now tho... I am sure I would get argumentative > again if I didn't... :) Still I started out with the position that I thought > there was some strange resistance among ETD authors towards multipartial > displays... and this last exchange simply reinforces that standpoint. > -- > Richard Brekne From what I've read, it has never gotten to be argumentative. I saw some pertinent information go by, and some practical concerns (in some detail) voiced by other techs. What I haven't seen is an attempt to resolve some of these concerns. That's the only strange resistance to ideas I've found here. Which ETD authors have posted with this strange resistance to multi partial displays? I don't seem to have received those posts and would like to read their thoughts for myself. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC