Verituner Update

[Richard Brekne]

Curious about something David. We discuss back and forth a bit about ETD's and
measurments. No one seems to feel that measurements are all that dependable
unless you take a few samples for each note and average them out.

Does the Verituner utilize some new and more dependable form for measuring
inharmonicities, or do you not consider this to be a problem ?

Dave Carpenter wrote:

> David,
>
> Regarding inharmonicity readings, I would say that the main difference is
> that the Verituner takes these measurements while you are tuning so that you
> do not need a separate measurement step. This saves time and simplifies the
> tuning process. Furthermore, it takes these measurements on all the notes
> that you tune, instead of just a select few. This allows it to account for
> irregularities in inharmonicity, instead of just assuming that the
> inharmonicity follows a smooth progression between measured notes.
>
> --Dave
>
> --- David Ilvedson <ilvey@jps.net> wrote:
> > Dave,
> >
> > I guess I would like to know what the Verituner does
> > that is different from the SAT III or RCT?   How
> > does it work?  Does it take inharmonicity readings
> > AKA the other top devices?
> >
> > David I.
> >

--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
Bergen, Norway
mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no