Bill, Don, List, Appears to me like both questions were skirted. Were they not reasonable enough, or were they assumed a dig and you two just have it in for one another, or Š? Concerning Don's first question, I have always assumed Bill B. created the expression 'Reverse Well' by reading your posts in the past, but maybe you picked it up from somewhere else, and I overlooked that fact. Yes / No? As for Don's second question, I certainly don't dispute your abilities and knowledge, Bill, but if what you have just recently said, "... most people as well never recognize consciously that the piano is tuned differently from the usual Š because I have remained within the bounds of error that most people make when trying to tune ET Š", then why all the hoopla that has been in your posts on how much better EBVT is over Equal Temperament and the one you call Reverse Well? Kind of mystified by these recent comments, Keith McGavern Registered Piano Technician Oklahoma Chapter 731 Piano Technicians Guild USA >>...Don Rose... >>This kind of error has been named, "Reverse Well" (RW). >>Who named it "reverse well"? Or is this a term you created? > >I think Einstein made it up one day when he tried to tune his own piano >with a pair of vice grips and a drum key. > >>In other words most people never hear the difference between your EBVT, ET >>*OR* "reverse well"? > >O hell no, people always stop listening to their pianos once they get that >first free 15 minute tuning. > >Bill Bremmer RPT... , Billbrpt@AOL.COM, drpt@sk.sympatico.ca
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC