This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Todd Mapes=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: December 13, 2001 5:13 AM Subject: Cracked plate List, This week I experienced my first cracked plate. It's not an = experience I would like to have again. The piano was a Kimball console = which, according to the customer, had not been tuned in 18 years by the = previous owner. The current owners had recently acquired it for $300 = and wanted it tuned up so the wife could play Christmas music. I opened = the piano up and found a dead mouse and several mouse droppings (the = mouse was mostly decayed), which, in my opinion shows that the piano = hadn't been tuned recently and probably not played in several years, = either. I noticed no other problems besides a few broken Schwander butt = springs, so I got out my SAT III and checked the pitch. The piano was = 185-200 cents flat. I did the first pitch raise with no overshoot and = then checked pitch again. The SAT III reading now was about 35-40 cents = flat, so I programmed in a 25% overshoot and began tuning the piano at = A0. As I crossed the bass/tenor break, I heard a LOUD "bang" which was = much louder than any string breakage I'd ever heard, so, fearing the = worst, I got down under the keybed and looked at the plate. The plate = had cracked right through the hitch pin area. The crack was all the way = through the plate and I called the customer over and informed her of the = plate breakage and that it was probably not feasible to repair the = plate, and even if it was, there could be no guarantees of success on = such a repair. She understood that the piano was a complete loss, I = collected a minimum service call fee and left. Two days later, her husband calls me up demanding that I reimburse him = for $300 or provide him with an acceptable replacement. I informed him = that I had no intention of doing so, because the plate cracked due to = lack of structural integrity. He informed me that his opinion was that = the plate cracked due to my incompetence and/or negligence. I then = explained the pitch raise procedure that I performed and told him that = to the best of my knowledge, I had exercised due professional care and = was not responsible for the demise of his piano. As a parting comment, = the customer said he would just have to take me to small claims court = and recover his money. He could be bluffing, but then again, he seemed = pretty adamant about collecting his $300. First, was the breakage your responsibility? Unlikely. Speaking from = experience it is not all that unusual for plates on pianos of this type = to break on their initial chip to pitch--which is roughly the equivalent = of what you were doing. I mean it isn't something that happens every = day, but it's not all that unusual an event, either. Plates of this type = were typically designed and engineered with a minimal safety margin. = Indeed, it may not have been 'engineered' at all in that sense. More = likely the stress analysis consisted of "If at least a few of them don't = break once in a while we're probably putting too much iron in = there--take out the excess and lower the cost." In other words, if the = majority of them don't break, they're strong enough. Can it be repaired? Probably. From your description of the location of = the break it doesn't sound like it was an area of all that much stress. = It's a bit late now, but you might have looked for an improperly seated = plate or nosebolt in the vicinity. In any case, it can probably be = either stitched or welded. Personally, I'd opt for welding--I've had = more experience with it. And, you'd probably want a bit of reinforcement = added on for good measure. I've been involved in the repair of quite a = few cracked and/or broken plates by now and, to the best of my = knowledge, they are all holding fine. (I'm not a welder, but I've known = some really good ones over the years.) I've also declined even = attempting to repair a few, such as the crack-prone Bechstein plates of = some decades back. Apparently a combination of poor metallurgy, overly = rapid cooling and generally poor design. The Kimball plate in question = was cast by either Kelly or Wickham. In either case the tensile strength = would be up around 24,000 to 26,000 lbs/in2 minimum. In other words, the = carbon content should be low enough that a welder familiar with modern = welding techniques and materials and with cast iron Diesel engine blocks = and heads shouldn't have any problem with it. Would it be worth the effort? Probably not. No, make that definitely = not. The plate would have to come out of the piano, which means = restringing and all of the attendant work. The cost of welding, strings = and pins just exceeded the value of the piano. Not to mention your labor = and moving costs. You might want to go back to the recent Journal article on broken plates = and read up on the information presented there. After you are some more = conversant on the subject, call the owner back and see if you can get = him to see the futility of his position. (But, try to understand his, as = well.) In the end you will probably prevail in court, but it will cost = you a lot of time in preparation and most of a day for the actual event. = Good luck. Del ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/fd/d5/64/56/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC