I'm convinced that for whatever reason, many (most?) people think that there is a fundamental difference between the design and construction of a "baby" grand as opposed to a grand. When you tell them it is nothing more than a layman's term for "small" grand piano and that there is nothing fundamentally different between a "baby" grand and a grand, except for size, they are often a bit disbelieving. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin E. Ramsey" <ramsey@extremezone.com> To: "tech list piano" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:42 PM Subject: Re: double-wound strings... > Someone on the list wrote; > > "I'm not sure what mine is, but it sounds fairly good > to me. (It's quite a lot better than my mom's 5-foot > premie(sp?) baby grand and way better than some > friends' spinets, but not quite as nice as a 9-foot > baby grand." > > That's the second time I've heard a 9 foot piano referred to as a Baby > Grand, the first was by a regular ol' pianer owner. If a nine-footer is a > baby, I'd really like to hear the Concert Grand ( and see it too). > > > > > Kevin E. Ramsey > ramsey@extremezone.com >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC