proper use of PTG name

[Clyde Hollinger]

Phil,

It was late, and I was tired with a headache, and I know how easy it is for me
to form a strong opinion when I'm not sure I have all the facts, so I did soft
pedal on this, and I know it.  I can understand your response; thanks for
counting to ten.  <G>  Please forgive me.

Regards, Clyde

Phil Bondi wrote:

> Clyde the diplomat said:
>
> >Maybe the ad is not technically
> > false, but I'm quite certain it will give the false impression.  No one
> should
> > resort to that.  Too bad.
> >
> ..(before i blow a fuse, count to 10 and maybe there's a slo-blow there
> instead..)..
>
> ok..I'm better now..'too bad'?..am I reading that correctly?..am I reading
> something out of context here?
>
> >From Gary's (welcome aboard, by the way) original post, he states that the
> letters RPT do not appear in the ad, and the advertiser claims to be a
> former president _OF_ the PTG, not _IN_ the PTG..from what I can gather of
> how the structure works here, there is a difference..a big difference..and
> it's misleading and according to Jeannie, not allowed.
>
> Gary, I would recommend letting Kirk know about this ad. Maybe he already
> does. There's not too many layers to get to the top in this organization,
> and I would imagine a letter to the advertiser would be at least a minimum
> of what we as an organization are allowed to present to the alledged
> mis-informant.
>
> To let it go by the wayside would be 'too bad',
> roo(k)