EBVT tunings

[Richard Brekne]

Sure willing to give this a shot Robert... but I have a hinch Bill is
right... you may come close.. but not really getting the whole cigar...
Problem is the same all ETD's have to deal with... single partial
buisness... To get it just right you probably have to actually count the
beats... that means at the very least dealing with two different notes
each with their own partial as part of each relavant coincident pair to
achieve the effects.

But I will give it a shot... and let you know what I think.

(I leave the Veritune out of this as I have no idea how it works yet)

Robert Scott wrote:

> I have heard it said that EBVT tunings cannot be accurately
> represented by cents offset from ET.  Could those of you that
> tune EBVT aurally and have access to an ETD please try these
> offsets with an ETD:
>
> A     -1.7
> A#    -0.1
> B     -1.2
> C      3.6
> C#    -0.8
> D      0.1
> D#     0.3
> E     -2.6
> F      1.4
> F#    -3.0
> G      2.8
> G#     0.8
>
> These offsets were derived by a theoretical analysis of Bill Bremmer's
> instructions as applied to a piano of average inharmonicity.  I would
> like to know how such a tuning turns out if done with an ETD.
>
> -Robert Scott
>   Real-Time Specialties

--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no