Charles wirteth.... >It also had a spring > mechanism on each key that would eliminate the need to weight keys with > lead. more..... ! svp ---ric ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles E Faulk <cfaulk2@juno.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:25 PM Subject: Re: SD-10 Clarification > Roger, > > Funny you should mention the experimental SD that was left after Harold > was retired. He called it the "Gray" piano. It had a flat steel plate, as > you said, with welded struts. The idea behind that was to lend precision > to all the plate elevations and thicknesses. With a plate like he > envisioned, one could almost set the plate in a case without the need to > adjust it's height for downbearing ... almost. I remember hearing it on > several occasions played by some formidable artists. Quite a good piano, > but unfortunately not significantly better than the existing SD-10. Too > bad he never had a chance to develop it fully. It also had a spring > mechanism on each key that would eliminate the need to weight keys with > lead. > > Regards, > > Charles > On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 09:43:10 -0600 Roger Jolly <baldyam@sk.sympatico.ca> > writes: > > Hi Charles, > > Thank's for the input, sounds logical. The notes I > > had, > > asked as many unaswered questions as it did answers. > > I recently had the chance to look at one his prototype's (SD12?). > > Baldwin > > donated it to the Cincinnati Museum of Art. The forward duplexes > > were tuned > > an octave higher than the speaking length. The trench was clearly > > visible, > > the resonators were split, and looked to be adjustable. The treble > > sounded > > cleaner, but lacked the power of a production SD10. > > > > It had a welded steel plate, and metal action frames. I'm guessing, > > but > > probably the plate was made this way to save the cost of making a > > pattern > > for a casting. > > I wish there was more time to examine more closely. > > > > Regards Roger
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC