Tone Regulating was PA state convention... help

Gina Carter ginacarter@carolina.rr.com
Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:56:39 -0500


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Moffatt <moffattr@cadvision.com>
>
>Regulating tone, can only
> precede an in depth ability to tune and regulate the action at concert
> level.
> IMHO.
>
> Bob Moffatt

Bob,

I think with the amazingly good ETDs available today, the ability to tune at
"concert level" is not the issue. I recall those incredible learning
experiences I had in regulating and voicing classes with Fred Drasche and
Joe Bisceglie, neither of whom ever learned to tune and who freely admitted
it.

Regulating tone doesn't necessarily mean that one is regulating at concert
level. Sometimes hammers produce a sound that almost renders the piano
incapable of being tuned. This is when pre-voicing with steam or needles
will get rid of some of those unwanted partials that make the piano scream
to the tuner's ears. Try it on a 30 year old spinet for example. Using this
kind of tone regulating before tuning does make it easier to achieve a good
tuning on that piano.

Of course, achieving a concert level tone for a concert piano requires that
the action first be regulated to its maximum capability, strings leveled,
etc. If the hammer does not rise in its correct arc and strike the string in
its correct tangent, tone will always be adversely effected. However, the
piano does not need to be at "concert tune" to regulate. Many master
regulators like Fred and Joe had the amazing ability to hear through the
tuning to the actual sound the hammers produced.  Heaven knows I am
certainly not in their league, but I "regulate tone" all the time without
the piano being tuned at "concert level." Depends on what kind of tone
regulating I'm doing.

Gina





This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC