This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Wimblees@AOL.COM=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: December 30, 2000 7:29 PM Subject: Larger piano? was Re: Decibel Levels Del=20 Are you saying that a larger piano (lets say 7') in a church will not=20 necessarily produce a larger sound than a smaller piano, (lets say = 5')?=20 One problems we have in this industry is that a small piano is being = used in=20 a large sanctuary, where the piano player pounds the daylights out of = the=20 keys, in order to be heard. (which results in broken strings) What I = have=20 been trying to convince some churches is that they need a larger piano = to=20 produce more volume, so that the piano player doesn't have to pound so = hard.=20 But now, from what you say, a larger piano will not help. Or am I = missing=20 something?=20 Wim=20 ----------------------------------------------------------- Yes. Bass. Especially in the example you give which is obviously = rather extreme. A typical 5' (152 cm) piano will have an A-1 bass string = of approximately length of between 1050 and 1150 cm. With a ridiculously = short back scale. And with a bass bridge either mounted on an cantilever = or right next to the rim. Or both. This will allow virtually no = soundboard movement at the fundamental frequency of 27.5 cps.=20 A more realistic comparison might be a 170 to 180 cm (5'7" to 5' 11") = piano compared to the 7' (210 to 215 cm). The example I gave compared = the Fandrich 122 cm (48") Vertical to the Bosendorfer Imperial. This = vertical scale is roughly comparable to what could be found on a modern = 170 to 175 cm (5' 7" to 5' 9") grand.=20 Now, I don't have a scale for the Imperial handy, so let's use a = Steinway D scale for comparison--I doubt the Imperial scale is any = longer, if as long, at this point. F-33 in the D is approximately 975 mm = (38.4") long. It is only 960 mm (37.8") in the Model B. In the Fandrich = Vertical it is 950 mm (37.4") long. This is not an acoustically = significant difference as my side-by-side comparison with the Imperial = indicated. From this point down there is no way to directly compare the = two scales. The 122 Vertical changes from steel strings to bi-chord = wrapped strings at that point and the D uses steel strings down to F-21. = It is interesting to note, however, that the first bass note (E-20) of = the Steinway B is approximately 1025 to 1030 mm (40.4" to 40.6") long = and the same note in the 122 Vertical scale is 1022.5 mm (40.3") long. The longer string of the longer piano does--or at least, if the piano = is designed to take full advantage of its length, it should--give a = clearer and more articulate bass. But it will not necessarily be louder = than its smaller counterpart. It does--or, again, should--put more = energy in the fundamental of the bass note being played and this should = help the bass notes carry through better. But the smaller piano will = (should) be capable of essentially the same acoustical power through = that part of the musical scale most commonly used. (Keep in mind, also, = that acoustical power has to be either doubled or halved for our ears to = discern any change.) And, even in the low bass some smaller pianos can = generate a considerable amount of acoustical power. It may not always be = very pleasant to listen to, but the numbers will be there.=20 My point is simply, all things being equal and through most of the = musical scale, larger pianos are not necessarily capable of = significantly higher power levels as measured by a sound pressure level = meter. Not that there will be no difference at all. There are so many = variables involved that these kinds of generalities simply cannot be = taken at face value. A well-designed small piano might very well = out-perform a poorly designed larger piano. Each has to be evaluated and = judged on its own merits. Personally, I think many church musicians play excessively loud = because they simply cannot hear the piano over the choir and/or the = congregation singing, not because of any inherent limitation on the part = of the piano itself. The worst situation I have ever encountered in this = regard was a church that had a quite nice Baldwin SD-6. I thought the = piano was pretty loud when I tuned it, yet the pianist complained that = it was not loud enough and he was, indeed, pounding the poor thing to = death. Turned out he simply couldn't hear the piano from his own seat = directly in front of the choir. A mike, monitor amp and a small speaker = aimed directly at him mostly solved the problem. While it didn't make = him a better pianist, he did stop his pounding and everybody was much = happier by the result. Del ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/38/c7/14/7b/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC