Snappy Baldwin Tuning Pins

Billbrpt@AOL.COM Billbrpt@AOL.COM
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:41:21 EST


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 12/22/00 7:56:17 AM Central Standard Time,=20
tito@PhilBondi.com (Phil Bondi)
 writes:


> (showing my forever rookiness)..is there a technique for setting snappy
> tuning pins so when/if they want to move, they move less than they are now=
?
> when they go, they really go.
>=20
> I THINK I know how to set a tuning pin..this situation in this environment
> is getting the best of me.
>=20
> hopefully, the suggestions here will help me.
>=20

Phil,

I can hardly believe what you are calling  "frigid".  It's below Zero here=20
but it's been colder and I know our Canadian friends would call what you are=
=20
experience a "heat wave".

Your question is timely.  I have an off line question from one of our=20
European contributors that ties into it.  I have been thinking about how to=20
answer him for quite a while but didn't know exactly where to begin.  Here i=
s=20
the question:

"I use alot of impact technic that=A0I seen Jim Coleman do on a video.
I=A0think it's Ok to pull up the string with a impact way and then "push the=
=20
pin and hit the key" it down if it didn't sit where I wanted the first time.=
=20
This works well on most pianos but I have trouble with a few brands.
[My teacher] wants me to learn to tune the usually way and I suppose he's=20
right about that.=20
The problem is I find it difficult to control the pin by pushing it up"

I'm sure there are and will be differing opinions about this but I have had=20
these same experiences too.  For the first 10 years I tuned, I used a slow=20
pull type technique.  Then, I attended my first convention in Minneapolis in=
=20
1979.  There, I saw the late George Defebaugh RPT and Jim Coleman RPT's=20
lecture on tuning.  Although I have never see the video spoken of, I assume=20
it teaches essentially the same techniques I saw back then.

I went home from that Convention and put into practice the things I learned=20
and by doing so, reduced the time it took me to tune by a very significant=20
amount and increased my skill level from far below RPT standards to high=20
enough to Qualify as an Examiner Trainee in just two years.  The two most=20
important elements were the Pitch Raising Technique and the Hammer Technique=
.

Even today, I can try to tell other technicians what I learned then, as=20
George put it, "You can tune a piano twice, much faster and easier than you=20
can fight with it once" but I still see many who struggle, grunt and groan=20
their way through a two hour or more tuning that ends up quite inaccurate an=
d=20
unstable.  When the customer is told after that ordeal, "I'll have to do it=20
over again in two weeks", the decision is usually made to try someone else=20
next time.

George emphasized that an impact type technique is the "most mechanically=20
correct way to [operate the tuning hammer and] move the string", according t=
o=20
him.  I have seen many people claim with the strongest conviction that the=20
tuning hammer should be at 10 o'clock (on verticals) or "in line with the=20
strings", but both Jim and George proved that not to be true over 20 years=20
ago.

The answer to your tight and jumpy pins problem is to move them with quick,=20
jarring motions.  Yes, it will take practice.  You may not be able to make=20
the more subtle impact movements right away but with practice, you'll get a=20
feel for it.

On the other hand, a slow pull technique only tends to bend and flex the pin=
=20
causing inevitable but unnecessary instability.  Next time you get to tune a=
=20
Steinway vertical and you have learned this technique, see if it does not go=
=20
much easier.  I serviced one of those Steinway consoles from the 1950's just=
=20
yesterday and thought about that.  It is a well designed, solid as a rock=20
instrument with beautiful tone and only marginally more difficult for me to=20
tune than other pianos.  It's not anywhere near enough to complain about.  I=
t=20
was difficult however to remove and replace the action for flange tightening=
.

When using an impact type technique on a vertical with no plate bushings and=
=20
with the Tuning Hammer at 2 o'clock, any bending or twisting of the pin is=20
minimized and in the downward direction.  The string (when raising the pitch=
)=20
is jacked up through the bearing points.  It takes very little over pull.  I=
t=20
settles right down where it belongs and stays.

All modern Baldwin Grands are known for their tight and cracking tuning pins=
.=20
 An impact type technique is the best way to control them and achieve the=20
most stable results with ease and in the least amount of time.  The only tim=
e=20
I use a slow pull technique is on pianos with marginally loose or nearly=20
uncontrollable, low torque pins.  This kind of technique seems more like the=
=20
way you would tune a harpsichord to me.  Generally, it is not the best way t=
o=20
try to tune a piano.

Good luck,
=A0
Bill Bremmer RPT
Madison, Wisconsin

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/df/e1/08/7e/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC