Richard,, The way the current test is set up here, is that you must be able to tune, ( granted, it's only three octaves.) aurally the center section of the piano. I think it's from B2 to C5. Then you're graded using fairly tight standards as to A440, stability, etc. For all practical purposes, if you aren't a pretty good aural tuner,,you aren't going to pass. Doesn't involve using the machine at all. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 1:13 AM Subject: Re: ETD's, calculators and the exam > > > "Kevin E. Ramsey RPT" wrote: > > > I agree with Willem, somewhat.. The current tuning test is set up in > > such a way, that even if someone regularly uses an ETD to tune with, they > > must have a pretty good idea of how to tune aurally. I've heard "old timers" > > say that they want to keep their membership dues up to date, just because > > the exam is a lot more difficult now than it used to be. > > I regularly tune with an ETD, but I passed the tuning exam with an > > average score of 98%. > > I really think that if someone is a good aural tuner, buying and using a > > SAT can really take your tuning to the next level,,,,, provided you know > > what you're doing. I think most of the objections to ETD's on this list are > > to people who DON'T know how to tune using them, and just "stopping the > > lights". "There, it's correct, see, the lights say so." It's that kind of > > behavior that gives the machines a bad name. > > - > > Yes... well... let me see... how is it that you suppose that we should be able > to idendify whether an examinee can do more then just stopping the lights if the > test requires no more of them then to do just that ? I am open enough to using > ETD's in a testing proceedure, but not at the cost of being able to confirm > aural skills. > > Richard Brekne > RPT, N.P.T.F. > Bergen, Norway > mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC