DING DING DIN DING DING!! Sorry, incorrect answer, that's NOT what I said. No one is disputing that the climate appears to be changing. The possible cause of it and effects are the issues. To have sound scientific conclusions one must first apply the scientific method. 1. A theory 2. A hypothesis to test the theory 3. A sample model 4. A control group model 5. A substantial and credible amount of tested data from both the sample and control group to support the hypothesis. Unfortunately it is not possible to create a sample group and a control group for the earth's environment. This only leaves theory with no practical data in which to prove a theory, i.e. are evil rotten humans ruining the earth by using toaster ovens. Then comes the politics and the media which tends to skip chapters 9 and 10 and go straight to the end of the book at chapter 47 and predict dooms day if we don't stop using outdoor BBQs. Nuf said, I got to go. I have to drive my evil gas consuming transportation device to a clients home tonight to do a tuning. Then I have to finish installing an evil electric energy consuming PianoDisc system. Rob Goodale, RPT Las Vegas, NV Richard Brekne wrote: > So let me see if I understand you Robert... virtually the entire scientific > community, save a few Rush Limbaugh employees... grin.., all government agencies > accross the globe, and virtually everyone who has used a greater portion of there > lives studying this climate stuff are all wrong,,,,, and you are right..
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC