> what's your feelings about >a nominal fee for expanded search cpabilities? >Regards roger I wouldn't have a problem with it, since I've learned lots of thousands of dollars worth of pretty good stuff from the List, but it's another level of administrative hassle. Who pays? Since there are no restrictions or mandatory affiliations required for participation on the List, who's responsibility is it? How many of the "casuals" and "lurkers" will feel the necessity to kick in? Didn't we make some noise at KC about looking into getting some funding from the home office to upgrade the server and such? Did anything come of that? Since the List is PTG supplied, it seems reasonable that PTG members should support it monetarily, either through normal dues, or one time surcharge, regardless of List participation. Non PTG members who avail themselves of whatever technical information they can sift out should be encouraged, but not necessarily required, to kick in too. That's my "off the top" - and it's reading a whole lot like a political stand, so I'll shut up now and go away before I'm mistaken for a participant in the "system". Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC